Chery Tiggo 8 Pro (Premium Flagship) vs Skoda Kodiaq TDI Ambition Plus Comparison in Nepal 2026

Updated . Prices and specs from Nepal distributors where published.

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro (Premium Flagship) side viewPetrol
Chery

Tiggo 8 Pro (Premium Flagship)

Rs 1,05,00,000
Price in Nepal
Engine
1598 cc
Power
197 PS
Mileage
12 kmpl
Boot
479 L
Price and all trims of the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro (Premium Flagship)
Skoda Kodiaq TDI Ambition Plus side viewPetrol
Skoda

Kodiaq TDI Ambition Plus

Rs 1,30,00,000
Price in Nepal
Engine
1498 cc
Power
150 PS
Mileage
14.86 kmpl
Boot
281 L
Price and all trims of the Skoda Kodiaq TDI Ambition Plus

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro starts at Rs 1.05 crore and the Skoda Kodiaq at Rs 1.3 crore in Nepal, so the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro costs Rs 25 lakh less (24%). The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro returns about 12 kmpl and the Skoda Kodiaq about 14.86 kmpl. Engines are 1598 cc and 1498 cc. Figures on this page are for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro (Premium Flagship) and the Skoda Kodiaq TDI Ambition Plus.

Boot space is 479 litres in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro and 281 litres in the Skoda Kodiaq.

What's different

Spec
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
PriceRs 25 lakh apartRs 105 lakhRs 130 lakh
Engine100 cc apart1598 cc1498 cc
Mileage2.9 kmpl apart12 kmpl14.9 kmpl
Torque40 Nm apart290 Nm250 Nm
Boot space198 L apart479 L281 L
Fuel tank11 L apart51 L62 L

Full specifications

Engine and performance

7 of 7 differ
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
Engine1598 cc1498 cc
CylindersNot listed4
Max power197 PS @ 5500 rpm150 PS / 204 PS / 265 PS (vRS)
Max torque290 Nm (1.6T) / 390 Nm (2.0T)250 Nm / 320 Nm / 400 Nm
Gearbox7-Speed Wet DCT7-speed DCT Automatic
DriveFWD / AWD (Intelligent All-Wheel Drive)4MOTION 4WD
AccelerationNot listed6.3 s (0-100 km/h)

Range, mileage and charging

2 of 2 differ
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
Mileage (company claim)12 kmpl14.86 kmpl
Fuel tank51 litres62 litres

Brakes, suspension and tyres

1 of 1 differ
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
ABSNot listedYes

Size, weight and space

7 of 8 differ
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
Length4800 mm4758 mm
Width1860 mm1864 mm
Height1746 mm1679 mm
Wheelbase2710 mm2791 mm
Ground clearance204 mmNot listed
Kerb weight1800 kgNot listed
Seats77
Boot space479 litres281 litres

Ownership

1 of 1 differ
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
Est. EMIRs 1,33,900/monthRs 1,65,700/month

Features

22 of 35 differ
Chery Tiggo 8 ProSkoda Kodiaq
NCAP RatingNot listed5-star (Euro NCAP)
AirbagsYes9
ABS / StabilityYesABS with EBD
TPMSYesYes
ISOFIXYesYes
Hill HoldYesYes
Hill Descent ControlNot listedYes
Cruise ControlAdaptive (ACC)Adaptive Cruise Control
Emergency Braking (AEB)YesFront Assist (AEB)
Forward Collision WarningNot listedYes
Lane AssistYesLane Assist
Blind Spot DetectionYesYes
Rear Cross Traffic AlertYesYes
360° CameraYesYes
Reverse CameraNot listedYes
Parking SensorsNot listedFront + Rear
Auto HoldYesYes
Traffic Jam AssistNot listedYes
Driver Attention MonitorYesYes
Auto High BeamNot listedYes
Auto HeadlampsYesYes
Climate ControlYesTri-zone climate control
SunroofPanoramicPanoramic sunroof
Heated/Ventilated SeatsHeated + VentilatedHeated & ventilated front seats
Keyless Entry & StartYesYes
Drive ModesNot listedEco/Normal/Sport/Individual/Snow/Off-Road
Ambient LightingNot listedYes
Electronic Parking BrakeYesYes
Infotainment12.3-inch dual13-inch touchscreen
Instrument ClusterNot listedVirtual Cockpit (10.25-inch)
ConnectivityNot listedWireless Apple CarPlay & Android Auto
Wireless ChargingYesYes
Sound SystemNot listedCanton 12-speaker premium audio
Heads-Up DisplayNot listedYes
Connected Car TechYesYes

Prices and specifications come from the Nepal distributors and manufacturers where published. "Not listed" means we could not verify a figure yet. EV range is shown as WLTP or a WLTP-equivalent estimate, with the company claim and its test cycle beside it. Real range and mileage vary with roads, load and riding style.

Which suits you?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro may suit you if you want to spend less or you need more boot space.

The Skoda Kodiaq may suit you if you want lower fuel bills.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro may suit you if

  • You want to spend less
  • You need more boot space

The Skoda Kodiaq may suit you if

  • You want lower fuel bills

Try both on your daily route and talk to each service centre before you decide.

Compare with another vehicle

Share

Prices and more comparisons

For every trim and the latest price, see Chery Tiggo 8 Pro price in Nepal and Skoda Kodiaq price in Nepal. Browse by budget: All petrol car prices in Nepal.

Related comparisons

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro (Premium Flagship) vs Skoda Kodiaq TDI Ambition Plus FAQs

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro or Skoda Kodiaq: which suits me in Nepal?
It depends on what you need; neither suits every buyer. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro may suit you if you want to spend less or you need more boot space. The Skoda Kodiaq may suit you if you want lower fuel bills.
What is the price difference between Chery Tiggo 8 Pro and Skoda Kodiaq?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro starts at Rs 1.05 crore and the Skoda Kodiaq at Rs 1.3 crore in Nepal, so the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro costs Rs 25 lakh less (24%). Prices change with taxes and offers, so check each price page for the latest trims.
Which gives better mileage, Tiggo 8 Pro or Kodiaq?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro returns about 12 kmpl and the Skoda Kodiaq about 14.86 kmpl. Mileage in Kathmandu traffic is usually lower than the rated figure for both.
What engine do the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro and Skoda Kodiaq have?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro has a 1598 cc engine making 197 PS @ 5500 rpm. The Skoda Kodiaq has a 1498 cc engine making 150 PS / 204 PS / 265 PS (vRS).
How far can the Tiggo 8 Pro and Kodiaq go on a full tank?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro has a 51 litre tank, about 612 km at 12 kmpl. The Skoda Kodiaq has a 62 litre tank, about 921 km at 14.86 kmpl. These are estimates from the rated mileage.
What gearbox do the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro and Skoda Kodiaq use?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro uses a 7-Speed Wet DCT gearbox and the Skoda Kodiaq a DCT Automatic gearbox.
Which has more space, Tiggo 8 Pro or Kodiaq?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro seats 7 and the Skoda Kodiaq seats 7. Boot space is 479 litres against 281 litres.