Ford Ranger XL A/T vs Mitsubishi L200 GL (MT) Comparison in Nepal 2026
Compare price, performance, mileage, range and full specifications side by side.
| Spec | Ford Ranger | Mitsubishi L200 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.14 Cr | Rs. 92.50 Lakh |
| Engine | 1996 cc | 2442 cc |
| Mileage | 13.9 kmpl | 11.8 kmpl |
| Transmission | 10-Speed Automatic | Manual / Automatic |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Petrol |
| Seating | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi L200
2 vehicles selected
Complete view of all specifications in one place
Overview
Price
↓ lower
Fuel Type
Engine
↑ higher
Mileage
↑ higher
Transmission
Battery / Fuel
Mileage
↑ higher
Transmission
Fuel Tank
Performance
Engine
↑ higher
Engine Power
Seating Capacity
Dimensions
Length
Width
Height
Wheelbase
↑ higher
Ground Clearance
↑ higher
Features
No features listed
No features listed


| Spec name | Diesel Ford RangerXL A/T Rs. 1.14 Cr 2026EMI → | Petrol Mitsubishi L200GL (MT) Rs. 92.50 Lakh 2026EMI → | |
|---|---|---|---|
💰Price & Value3 specs | |||
Price ↓ lowerTotal cost before taxes and subsidies | Rs. 1.14 Cr | Rs. 92.50 Lakh | |
Est. EMI ↓ lowerEst. monthly EMI, 40% down, 10% p.a., 5-year loan | Rs. 1,45,202/mo | Rs. 1,17,921/mo | |
Fuel Type Electric, Petrol, Diesel or Hybrid | Diesel | Petrol | |
⚡Performance7 specs | |||
Engine ↑ higherEngine displacement in cubic centimetres | 1996 cc | 2442 cc Best | |
Engine Power Maximum power output of the engine (BHP / kW) | 207 bhp (154 kW) | 181 PS (178 bhp) @ 3,500 rpm | |
Engine Torque Peak torque (Nm @ rpm) | 500 Nm | 430 Nm @ 2,500 rpm | |
🔋Range & Efficiency7 specs | |||
Mileage ↑ higherFuel economy (km per litre) | 13.9 kmpl Best | 11.8 kmpl | |
Transmission Gearbox type (Manual, AT, CVT, AMT, DCT) | 10-Speed Automatic | Manual / Automatic | |
Fuel Tank Fuel tank capacity in litres | 80 L | 75 L | |
📏Dimensions5 specs | |||
Length Vehicle length in millimeters | N/A | 4800 mm | |
Width Vehicle width in millimeters | 1918 mm | 1815 mm | |
Height Vehicle height in millimeters | 1886 mm | 1775 mm | |
Wheelbase ↑ higherDistance between front and rear axle centers | 3270 mm Best | 3000 mm | |
Ground Clearance ↑ higherLowest point clearance from ground | 235 mm Best | 220 mm | |
✨Features2 specs | |||
Key Features Comparison
No features listed
No features listed